Skip to main content

Head to head

Cloudways vs SiteGround

This pairing is the best demonstration of the caveat that runs through this whole site. SiteGround is 67ms slower than Cloudways at the origin, yet 120ms faster globally — entirely because of how each one treats the CDN. Read only one of those columns and you reach the opposite conclusion.

Reviewed August 2026 · 2024–2025 benchmark data · methodology

Cloudways

2/5

metrics led

$14/mo

SiteGround

2/5

metrics led

$2.99/mo

Counted across the five measured columns below. Not a weighted score.

Quick verdict

Cloudways for most people

Cloudways has the faster server; SiteGround has the faster default delivery, at a much lower headline price. If you will run a CDN either way, Cloudways wins on the underlying hardware. If you want acceptable global performance out of the box for very little, SiteGround does that.

Go direct

Cloudways ad

118ms origin · $14/mo

Visit

SiteGround

185ms origin · $2.99/mo

Visit

Measured

Benchmark comparison

Straight from the ranking table — these figures are shared with the homepage dataset rather than restated here, so the two can never disagree.

Cloudways vs SiteGround benchmark metrics compared
Metric Cloudways SiteGround Edge
US origin TTFB No CDN — measures the server itself 118ms 185ms Cloudways −67ms
Global TTFB Each provider’s default delivery setup 312ms 192ms (CDN) SiteGround −120ms
Under load Concurrent-user simulation Stable Good Cloudways
Uptime Published availability figure 99.98% 99.98% Even
Entry price Lowest advertised plan $14/mo $2.99/mo SiteGround

Figures marked (CDN) are achieved with a bundled content delivery network and describe delivery rather than server performance. Comparing a CDN-assisted global figure against an unassisted one is not like for like.

Beyond the numbers

Key differences

The parts a benchmark cannot measure, which is usually where the decision actually gets made.

Raw server speed

Cloudways leads
Cloudways
118ms US origin TTFB — fastest in the table.
SiteGround
185ms US origin TTFB — mid-table.

Out-of-the-box global delivery

SiteGround leads
Cloudways
312ms without a CDN, which is the honest default figure.
SiteGround
192ms with the CDN its stack enables by default.

Headline price

SiteGround leads
Cloudways
$14/mo, flat.
SiteGround
$2.99/mo introductory, renewing substantially higher.

Cost honesty

Cloudways leads
Cloudways
The advertised price is the ongoing price.
SiteGround
Promotional pricing renews at a much higher rate — budget for year two.

Scaling headroom

Cloudways leads
Cloudways
Resize the server or move to a bigger cloud instance at will.
SiteGround
Plan-tier limits on resources and visits.

Decide

Which one should you pick?

Find the row that sounds most like you.

  • Smallest possible starting cost

    Nothing else in the table starts at $2.99/mo, provided you accept renewal pricing later.

    SiteGround
  • Global audience, no CDN configuration wanted

    192ms global TTFB by default, without buying or configuring anything extra.

    SiteGround
  • Growing site that will need more resources

    Server sizing is a slider, not a plan migration.

    Cloudways
  • You will run Cloudflare regardless

    With the CDN variable removed, the comparison comes down to origin speed — a 67ms gap.

    Cloudways

Common questions

Cloudways vs SiteGround FAQs

How can SiteGround be slower and faster at the same time?

They measure different things. US TTFB measures the origin server answering a request itself. Global TTFB measures what a worldwide visitor experiences, which for SiteGround means a CDN edge responding instead of the origin. Cloudways wins the first; SiteGround wins the second by default.

Is SiteGround really $2.99/mo?

For the introductory term. Renewal pricing is considerably higher, which is worth calculating over three years before treating it as the cheaper option.

Which should I pick if I plan to add Cloudflare myself?

Cloudways. Once both sit behind the same CDN, the difference that remains is origin performance, where Cloudways is meaningfully ahead.